Wall-E or the Terminator?

asimo_conduct-772338Independently minded robots, Isaac Asimov told us, need rules.  With well-structured, law abiding robots, we get terrific garbage service, expertly made French toast and great lawn care. With recklessly structured, disobedient robots, we get “He’s been sent from the future to kill you – that’s WHAT he does! That’s ALL he does!”  The choice is clear, and fortunately someone has started the discussion to get us moving in a kinder, gentler robotic direction.

Authors Wendell Wallach, an ethicist at Yale University, and historian and philosopher of cognitive science Colin Allen, at Indiana University have provided us with Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong to help guide the way.  The New Scientist discusses their six strategies for reducing robotic danger here.  Here’s one of them:

Program robots with principles

Building robots motivated to create the “greatest good for the greatest number”, or to “treat 416fkpnotol__sl500_sl150_others as you would wish to be treated” would be safer than laying down simplistic rules.

Likelihood of success: Moderate. Recognising the limits of rules, some ethicists look for an over-riding principle that can be used to evaluate all courses of action.

But the history of ethics is a long debate over the value and limits of many proposed single principles. For example, it could seem logical to sacrifice the lives of one person to save the lives of five people. But a human doctor would not sacrifice a healthy person simply to supply organs to five people needing transplants. Would a robot?

Sometimes identifying the best option under a given rule can be extremely difficult. For example, determining which course of action leads to the greatest good would require a tremendous amount of knowledge, and an understanding of the effects of actions in the world. Making such calculations would require time and a great deal of computing power.

If you think this is far-fetched, please check out the giggling robot, the violin-playing robot and, of course, Asimo.  We’re not as far away from the future Wallach and Allen describe as it first may seem.  And it’s imperative we move fast before this happens…

1 Comment

Filed under Books and Ideas

One response to “Wall-E or the Terminator?

  1. Without doubt we have to predict and anticipate the many roads our enhance capacity to build or create software with some artifical like intelligence .
    By the way, a lovely blog.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s